Free practice quiz
ABIM Hospice & Palliative Prep Course (Hospice): free quiz
10 questions from the program. See your score right away, then unlock the explanation of every answer.
- Question 1 of 10
A 68-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic cancer is receiving second-line chemotherapy. She has worsening abdominal pain, nausea, weight loss, and two hospitalizations in 6 weeks. She values more time at home but wants to continue cancer treatment if it may help. Her daughter asks whether palliative care means “giving up.” Which response is most appropriate?
Palliative care is need-based care for serious illness: it treats symptoms, supports communication, and helps align treatments with goals at any disease stage. C is correct because refractory symptoms, repeated hospitalizations, and complex goals warrant concurrent palliative and oncologic care. B confuses palliative care with hospice; hospice usually emphasizes comfort when disease-directed therapy is no longer goal-concordant. A is incorrect because code status is not a prerequisite for palliative consultation. D is incorrect because referral should not wait for a specific prognosis when symptom and communication needs are present.
- Question 2 of 10
A 79-year-old patient with progressive serious illness values avoiding hospitalization and maintaining familiar daily routines. A proposed intervention offers minimal expected benefit but would require a prolonged inpatient stay, whereas supportive care can be provided in the patient's preferred setting. After reviewing the options, the physician states, 'Both choices are equally good, and only you can decide.' Which aspect of this response most requires correction?
A: Correct. The statement creates false equivalence between options that differ substantially in their alignment with the patient's goals. Recommendation-based communication should identify and explain when one approach better matches patient priorities and expected clinical outcomes.
B: Incorrect. Explaining reasonable options is compatible with shared decision-making. The problem is not presenting alternatives but portraying them as equally suitable despite meaningful differences.
C: Incorrect. Patient preferences should inform recommendations. Integrating those preferences with prognosis and treatment tradeoffs is a central requirement of goal-concordant care.
D: Incorrect. Treatment intensity is not the determining standard. The relevant question is how the likely benefits and burdens of each approach fit the patient's goals.
- Question 3 of 10
A trainee documents 'visceral nociceptive pain' after interviewing a hospice patient. On review, the recorded symptoms consist of a persistent ache confined to a small, consistently identifiable area, without diffuse pressure, cramping, burning, shooting sensations, or numbness. Which interpretation of the trainee's classification is most appropriate?
A: Correct. The combination of well-localized and aching discomfort is characteristic of somatic nociceptive pain. This pattern is more consistent with the documented findings than a visceral classification.
B: Incorrect. Visceral pain is typically diffuse, cramping, or pressure-like. Localized aching is more characteristic of somatic pain.
C: Incorrect. Specific localization alone does not establish neuropathic pain. Neuropathic features more often include burning, shooting sensations, allodynia, or numbness.
D: Incorrect. Pain location and sensory descriptors are useful for recognizing characteristic somatic, visceral, and neuropathic patterns, even though they do not establish a definitive mechanism by themselves.
- Question 4 of 10
A 70-year-old hospice patient with advanced neurologic disease receives opioid analgesia intravenously because she cannot take oral medications. Her intravenous catheter becomes unusable, and the care team cannot immediately establish replacement access. She continues to require opioid therapy for pain control. Which intervention is most appropriate?
A: Incorrect. The inability to obtain intravenous access does not require discontinuation of opioid analgesia when another parenteral route is available.
B: Incorrect. Oral administration is not a suitable alternative when the patient cannot use that route.
C: Incorrect. Conversion between administration routes should follow equianalgesic principles rather than assuming identical doses are appropriate.
D: Correct. Subcutaneous administration is a useful parenteral option when oral therapy is not feasible and intravenous access is unavailable. The new regimen should be selected using cautious route-conversion principles.
- Question 5 of 10
A 72-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer has worsening right iliac bone pain despite low-dose morphine. Pain is deep, constant, and worse with weight bearing. She wants to minimize opioid escalation because of sedation. Creatinine is 0.8 mg/dL, platelet count is 230,000/mm3, and she has no history of peptic ulcer disease, anticoagulant use, or heart failure. Which opioid-sparing analgesic strategy is most appropriate?
Bone metastasis pain often has prostaglandin-mediated inflammatory and periosteal components; NSAIDs can be opioid-sparing when renal function, platelet count, and gastrointestinal risk are acceptable. D is safer but may undertreat inflammatory bony pain. C is correct: use a short scheduled NSAID trial with monitoring and gastroprotection when indicated. B is wrong because ketorolac is limited by substantial gastrointestinal, renal, and bleeding toxicity, especially with prolonged use. A is wrong because acetaminophen and NSAIDs are legitimate adjuncts; opioid escalation alone increases sedation risk.
- Question 6 of 10
A 79-year-old patient with advanced illness is experiencing distressing breathlessness and is considering systemic opioid therapy. The family worries that any exposure to an opioid will necessarily cause dangerous respiratory suppression. Which counseling statement best reflects appropriate palliative prescribing principles?
A: Correct. Concern about respiratory depression warrants careful prescribing and monitoring, not automatic avoidance. Low-dose initiation and cautious titration support appropriate treatment of air hunger.
B: Incorrect. The indication for opioid therapy does not eliminate the need to consider respiratory depression.
C: Incorrect. Fear of respiratory depression should not independently prevent appropriate monitored opioid therapy for distressing dyspnea.
D: Incorrect. A comfort-focused treatment goal does not remove the need for monitoring and careful titration.
- Question 7 of 10
A 65-year-old man with advanced pancreatic cancer has malignant bowel obstruction and is not pursuing surgery. Antiemetic treatment has reduced his sensation of nausea, but he continues to experience troublesome vomiting. The palliative care team wants to add medication specifically intended to reduce gastrointestinal secretions. Which intervention best matches this objective?
A — Incorrect. Increasing intestinal promotility is not equivalent to reducing gastrointestinal secretions and should not be escalated reflexively in complete obstruction.
B — Incorrect. An incomplete response to antiemetic therapy does not eliminate other medical options for obstruction-related symptoms.
C — Incorrect. Surgery requires evaluation of goals, prognosis, obstruction site, and candidacy. It is not automatically indicated by persistent vomiting.
D — Correct. Antisecretory agents are specifically included among the medical options for malignant bowel obstruction and address the stated objective of reducing gastrointestinal secretions.
- Question 8 of 10
A 68-year-old woman with advanced cancer becomes tearful when discussing her limited life expectancy. She continues to enjoy visits with her grandchildren, expresses appreciation for her remaining time, and describes sadness primarily when considering the anticipated separation from her family. She has no prominent neurovegetative symptoms. Which interpretation is most appropriate?
A: Correct. Sadness related to anticipated loss can be an expected emotional response to serious illness. Preserved enjoyment, meaningful relationships, and the absence of prominent neurovegetative symptoms support distinguishing this response from neurovegetative depression.
B: Incorrect. Tearfulness alone does not establish neurovegetative depression. The assessment should distinguish expected sadness from a more pervasive depressive syndrome.
C: Incorrect. Demoralization involves distress related to meaning, purpose, or perceived inability to cope. This patient continues to experience meaning and connection.
D: Incorrect. Fatigue is an important palliative symptom, but the vignette describes an emotional response to anticipated loss rather than low energy as the central problem.
- Question 9 of 10
A 69-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic cancer returns to discuss imaging that shows disease progression despite treatment. His oncologist plans to explain the findings and discuss their implications. The patient has not previously discussed the results. According to the Ask-Tell-Ask communication framework, what is the most appropriate initial approach?
A (Correct): The Ask-Tell-Ask framework begins by eliciting the patient's existing understanding. This establishes the patient's knowledge before new information is introduced and helps the clinician tailor the subsequent explanation.
B (Incorrect): Although inviting questions is valuable, immediately delivering the results bypasses the initial assessment of understanding and permission to share information.
C (Incorrect): Presenting comprehensive findings before assessing understanding reverses the recommended sequence and may overwhelm the patient.
D (Incorrect): Exploring emotions is important, but asking how the patient feels about results he has not yet received does not appropriately establish his baseline understanding.
- Question 10 of 10
A 76-year-old patient with advanced progressive illness is hospitalized after another acute deterioration. The patient has repeatedly stated that remaining comfortable at home and avoiding prolonged hospitalization are more important than extending life at any cost. The physician believes another burdensome intervention is unlikely to restore the patient's desired functional status. Which treatment recommendation is most appropriate?
A: Neutral presentation without guidance fails to help the patient identify the option most consistent with established goals and expected treatment burdens.
B: Correct. A physician recommendation should integrate the patient's values, prognosis, and likely burdens. Comfort-focused care is consistent with this patient's clearly expressed priorities and the limited expected benefit of additional burdensome treatment.
C: Treatment intensity alone does not determine appropriateness. Recommending greater intervention despite conflicting patient goals disregards values-based decision-making.
D: Shared decision-making permits and often benefits from physician guidance. Avoiding recommendations entirely is not required to preserve patient autonomy.
See why each answer is right or wrong
Enter your email to unlock the explanation of every question, free.